Return to website
Admission principles

Print page

This page was last updated Monday 24 September 2007

Effective management

Relating features of good governance, the QCA guidelines and basic reporting

 

Feature

 

QCA Guideline

 

Additional disclosure guidance

 

The governing body must have all the appropriate skills available to it in order to make the key decisions expected of it.

Recommendations for appointments to the board should be made by a nomination committee (or the board as a whole) and should be made after due evaluation.

The names of the directors, accompanied by sufficient biographical details (with any other relevant information) to enable shareholders to take an informed decision on the balance of the board.

 

Decision makers should be provided with the best possible information (accurate, sufficient, timely and clear) on which to challenge constructively recommendations made to them before making their decisions.

 

The board should be supplied in a timely manner with information (including regular management financial information) in a form and of a quality appropriate to enable it to discharge its duties.

 

 

The collective responsibility of the board requires all directors to be involved in the process of arriving at significant decisions.

 

There should be a formal schedule of matters specifically reserved for the board’s decision.

 

The number of meetings of the board (normally monthly) and of the committees and individual directors attendance at them.

 

Ineffective directors (executive and non-executive) must be identified and either helped to become effective or replaced.

 

All directors should be submitted for re-election at regular intervals, subject to continued satisfactory performance. The board should ensure planned and progressive refreshing of the board.

 

The board should describe any performance evaluation procedures it applies.

Copyright of the Quoted Companies Alliance

© copyright Investbx 2008